Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Isaac Liu

Isaac Liu
General Information
Name: Isaac Liu
Affiliation: Liberty University
Join Time: April 28, 2020 at 04:06PM EST
Send Message: You must Create an Account and Log-In to message users.
Debating Statistics
Wins: 0 (0 are Byes)
Losses: 0 (0 are Forfeits)
Average Points (Out of 30): 0 (0 total)
*Opponent Wins: 0
*Opponent Points: 0
Judging Statistics
Total Rounds Judged: 13
Average Points Given (Out of 30): 21.9
Voted Proposition In: 53.85% of rounds
Voted Opposition In: 46.15% of rounds
Average Length of Notes (Characters): 1991.2 (25886 total)
Matches
Current: None
Past:

Bearcat Open (Grades K-12)

Show

Bearcat Classic (Grades 6-12)

Show

Bearcat Classic (Grades 3-5)

Show

*Does not count opponents in bye or forfeit rounds.

Other
About Me: Debated 2 years of policy for Liberty University and did LD and PF in high school. Mechanical engineering major. Loves reading, gaming, and music.
Judge Philosophy: Top-level
I am fine with spreading if clarity is not sacrificed but will default to tournament norms. Tell me how to vote; I will vote for anything if articulated well, provided it does not cause in-round violence (i.e. arguing for racism, homophobia, sexism, etc.).

Kritiks
I am down with them. I lack familiarity with high-theory post-modernism arguments. I have some familiarity with criticism of anti-blackness and settler colonialism and am quite familiar with kritiks of capitalism and security. Regarding PF and LD, I will default to tournament norms regarding non-traditional affirmatives. For policy, I am 100% down with them, but also find framework persuasive (fairness can be an impact).

Theory
More favorable for the affirmative regarding negative counterplans; more favorable for the negative regarding affirmative plans. I tend to find arguments to reject arguments rather than the team more persuasive.

TLDR;
Votes off the flow and how you tell me to vote. Kritiks on the neg or aff* are cool. Don't run abusive affs or neg strats. Spread your heart out*.

*will default to tournament norms for LD and PF
Connect with Binghamton:
Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

PHP MySQL SUIT