Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Tricia Crump

Tricia Crump
General Information
Name: Tricia Crump
Affiliation: Baylor University
Join Time: March 15, 2021 at 06:37AM EST
Send Message: You must Create an Account and Log-In to message users.
Debating Statistics
Wins: 0 (0 are Byes)
Losses: 0 (0 are Forfeits)
Average Points (Out of 30): 0 (0 total)
*Opponent Wins: 0
*Opponent Points: 0
Judging Statistics
Total Rounds Judged: 0
Average Points Given (Out of 30): 0
Voted Proposition In: N/A
Voted Opposition In: N/A
Average Length of Notes (Characters): 0 (0 total)
Current: None
Past: None

*Does not count opponents in bye or forfeit rounds.

About Me: Electronic smokes (e-cigarettes) stand for a'tumultuous market place'; both the rise and availability of reduced hazard services and products has changed the ways in which smokers and e-cigarette users can use cigarette smoking. The accomplishment of e cigarettes may in part be credited to the related paraphernalia that tends to make'vaping' an even far more pleasurable experience than cigarette smoking or other types of nicotine replacement therapies (Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), 2017; Notley,'' Ward,'' Dawkins, & Holland, 2018).

The accelerated rise and evolution of this ecigarette economy usually means that research isn't necessarily representative of current tendencies. By way of instance, more modern generation devices make it possible for a high level of customisation by permitting changes to energy (wattage) and airflow, atomiser coils could be self explanatory, and also the availability of lesser resistance atomisers combined using elevated powered apparatus let an increase in aerosol generation (frequently referred to as sub-ohming or cloud chasing). Eliquid overly can be customised by changing nicotine content material, propylene glycol (PG) to vegetable glycerine (VG) ratio and proportion of flavouring, both from vape stores, or more commonly, by using the usage of arôme e liquide DIY electronic cigarettes.

DIY e-liquids are blended from different ingredients ordered from outlets or on-line merchants. Kits (mixing bottles, measuring syringes) and directions aimed at producing the practice simple, and dimensions precise, are widely available on the web and in vape retailers. The size of this clinic, motives for participation, and the protection of the result, however, are unknown. People of e-cigarettes participating in do-it-yourself e liquids also pose a issue for scientists assessing favorable (cigarette appetite reduction, smoking cessation) and negative (dual usage, exposure to unsafe and possibly harmful compounds ) ramifications of e-cigarettes/e-liquid, since they introduce an additional level of variability to an previously heterogeneous classification (Etter, 2014).

Do-it-yourself in other consumer behaviours could be attributed to reducing cost, but so that it encompasses a lifestyle, having the ability to stay informed about developments and also have command over the environment (Williams, 2004). For most this may be favorably strengthening, as hobbyist aspects really are a frequently cited rationale behind the good results of vaping (Farrimond, 2017; Ward, Cox, Dawkins, et al., 2018) and also DIY eliquids can be a portion of this. Inspiration for do it yourself e-liquid may be conducive to numerous factors, such as it may be cheaper than purchasing from a retailer. For consumers living in Europe, Article 20 of this European Union (EU) Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) (that came to full effect in May 2017) puts limitations on jar sizes (in 10 ml) along with a upper tobacco concentration of 20 mg/ml may likewise be an additional incentive. )

Thus far, there is no empirical research on motives for producing do it yourself eliquids, whether intended tobacco concentrations reflect people' goals, and if such fluids include hazardous or potentially dangerous pollutants. Lots of research nevertheless, have analyzed non-DIY commercially-available e-liquids (Etter, Zäther, & Svensson, 2013; Goniewicz, Gupta, Lee, et al., 2015; Goniewicz, Hajek, & McRobbie, 2014; Goniewicz, Kuma, Gawron, et al., 2013). As an instance, Etter et al. (2013) found that the promoted ingredients and nicotine concentrations tightly matched the merchandise descriptions. But they found that impurities were above recommended safety levels but likely below harmful levels.

The study used a two-year procedure to explore the practice of do it yourself e-liquids. During structured interviews we planned at know I) how members generated their own e liquids, ii) why they take part from the practice and iii) unique nicotine concentrations used. All those interviewed had been requested to mail an example of these DIY eliquid for lab testing in order to research I) intended versus actual nicotine and solvent concentration and DIY ) presence of harmful and possibly harmful components.

Judge Philosophy: Not Available
Connect with Binghamton:
Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: