Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: David Jen (The Wilberforce School) vs. Opposition: Minjae Jung (Leaders Academy)

Judge: Morgan Copeland (Liberty University)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • David Jen
    David Jen
    vs.



    Minjae Jung
    Minjae Jung
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 20, 2020 10:38:14PM EST by David Jen

    Citations

    Show

    Syrian Network for Human Rights
    the Brazillian Forum of Public Safety
    UN Human Rights Watch
    Fatal Encounters
    US Sentencing Commission
    National Criminal Justice Reference Service
    Innocence Project

    Posted at July 22, 2020 02:25:14AM EST by Minjae Jung

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 22, 2020 10:05:07PM EST by David Jen

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 24, 2020 02:28:26AM EST by Minjae Jung

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 24, 2020 07:56:02PM EST by David Jen

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 26, 2020 09:31:44AM EST by Morgan Copeland

    Category David Jen Minjae Jung
    Use of evidence: 3.3 3.3
    Delivery skill: 4 4.2
    Coherence of arguments: 3.9 3.7
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.2 4
    Identification of key points: 4 3.8
    Comments: Hey great debate if i could give a few tips I would suggest that as you are going through the debate you identify what you best arguments are and what your opponents best arguments are because some args that your opponent is going for are not the most important Hey great job I think that you did a good job identifying your key arguments and your opponents arguments and collapsing your case to your most important argument at the end of the debate

    The decision is for the Proposition: David Jen

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote pro I dont a concise reason on why the plan is bad I think that the neg goes for these arg. The argument that the pro is contradicting themselves and says that the pro has said things that they have not said. The pro has stated that this is a policy action by the UN. The UN should be dealing with human right issues which is something that the opposition says and criminal justice reform the way it is framed in this debate is a criminal justice reform


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT