Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Justin Suh (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Joshua Jen (The Wilberforce School)

Judge: Isaac Liu (Liberty University)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Justin Suh
    Justin Suh
    vs.



    Joshua Jen
    Joshua Jen
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 21, 2020 04:46:32AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    HERE IS THE LINK TO ALL OF MY CITATIONS THROUGHOUT THIS DEBATE. ALL SOURCES FROM EACH SPEECH WILL BE LISTED ON THE GOOGLE DOC :)

    Posted at July 21, 2020 02:51:10PM EST by Joshua Jen

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BwrGOJCHtbYfzMyXWFZXfB-BUP50jSrDljkvIKw-WCc/edit

    ^Link to all links i used for my research. I did not use all of them during my speech, just some people want to see what I used to formulate my arguments.

    Posted at July 23, 2020 03:31:17AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    SAME DOCUMENT, PLEASE REFER TO ALL THE SOURCES HERE

    Posted at July 23, 2020 03:19:51PM EST by Joshua Jen

    Citations

    Show

    same as before :)

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BwrGOJCHtbYfzMyXWFZXfB-BUP50jSrDljkvIKw-WCc/edit

    Posted at July 24, 2020 10:17:17AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    HERE IS THE LINK TO ALL OF MY CITATIONS THROUGHOUT THIS DEBATE. ALL SOURCES FROM EACH SPEECH WILL BE LISTED ON THE GOOGLE DOC :)

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 26, 2020 09:00:07PM EST by Isaac Liu

    Category Justin Suh Joshua Jen
    Use of evidence: 4.5 4
    Delivery skill: 6 6
    Coherence of arguments: 6 5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 6 5
    Identification of key points: 6 5.5
    Comments: Excellent debating. Very well done, I like the argument structure and organization. Good impact analysis. I addressed specific arguments in the video. Good debating. The counterplan strategy is what doomed you in my opinion. The speaking ability was good though, and the responsiveness is really good.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Justin Suh

    Reason for Decision:

    TLDR;
    The counterplan is not competitive and the proposition has offense against it. No impact to the net benefit. See the video for more analysis.

    Video from the judge:


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT