Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Sumin Park (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Saanvi Kumar (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Ian Miller (University of Oklahoma)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Sumin Park
    Sumin Park

    Saanvi Kumar
    Saanvi Kumar
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 13, 2020 08:22:13PM EST by Sumin Park



    Posted at July 14, 2020 10:31:15PM EST by Saanvi Kumar



    Posted at July 15, 2020 09:47:14PM EST by Sumin Park



    Posted at July 17, 2020 01:13:22AM EST by Saanvi Kumar



    Same Citations as Opposition Constructive.

    Posted at July 18, 2020 02:07:27AM EST by Sumin Park



    None available for this speech.


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 19, 2020 01:57:06PM EST by Ian Miller

    Category Sumin Park Saanvi Kumar
    Use of evidence: 4.4 4.5
    Delivery skill: 4.3 4.4
    Coherence of arguments: 4.5 4.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.3 4.5
    Identification of key points: 4.6 4.7
    Comments: You had good points - but I would try to argue for forensic science being something that the UN has specific jurisdiction or ability to do.

    I think that if you tied your arguments more to forensic science then you could avoid a lot of the more broad general arguments your opponent is making about the UN.
    Great speeches. I would try to impact your arguments out a little bit more. (example: if countries don't join they might have conflicts with each other which causes a lot of global instability)

    The decision is for the Opposition: Saanvi Kumar

    Reason for Decision:

    This was a good and very close debate. I ended up voting for the opposition.

    I ended up being persuaded that a large scale uniform change to the criminal justice system would be impossible due to differing policies between countries.

    The opposition reasoned out a lot of their arguments specific to the UN being a poor actor for reform which made sense to me, especially when it was supported by a lot of examples.

    I think that both sides would do better if they were more specific about forensic science in particular and if they impacted out their arguments more.

    Good debate!

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: