Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Jared Sul (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Joshua Jen (The Wilberforce School)

Judge: Christian Quiroz (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Jared Sul
    Jared Sul

    Joshua Jen
    Joshua Jen
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 12, 2020 08:51:51PM EST by Jared Sul



    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 14, 2020 06:55:20PM EST by Joshua Jen




    Posted at July 15, 2020 07:27:38PM EST by Jared Sul



    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 16, 2020 02:25:00PM EST by Joshua Jen



    I apologize for the lighting.

    Same as opp constructive speech.

    Posted at July 17, 2020 06:59:22PM EST by Jared Sul



    None available for this speech.


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 19, 2020 10:51:13PM EST by Christian Quiroz

    Category Jared Sul Joshua Jen
    Use of evidence: 3 3
    Delivery skill: 4.5 4
    Coherence of arguments: 4 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 4
    Identification of key points: 4 3.5
    Comments: I think you do a really good job focusing on the clarification of whether or not universal criminal justice reform can imply reform at different levels in different countries. Try to be more specific with some examples of how this might be the case! I think that you are doing a really good job explaining why it might not be a good idea for the UN to implement Criminal Justice Reform, but I think that you need to make sure to fully explain why either the reforms will not happen or they will cause some greater harm. The way you currently phrase it is as they might not be able to succeed.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Jared Sul

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote PROP because I think that in the end the PROP wins that we can uniformly implement at different levels, it just requires different countries to meet a certain common ground. This means that countries that are already working towards reforms are not affected. Finally, I think the PROP wins that the UN is necessary to force certain countries to change due to corrupt politicians. I think that if the OPP fully explained why the UN would NOT be able to enforce these reforms, then it’d be closer, but I think the PROP wins that UN intervention is necessary to ensure protection of rights in the CJS in different countries.

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: