Judge: Christian Quiroz (Unaffiliated)
Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at July 14, 2020 04:56:08AM EST by Justin Suh
(Document where all citations are listed)
Posted at July 14, 2020 11:47:04PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz
Posted at July 16, 2020 02:54:14AM EST by Justin Suh
Same google doc from constructive.
Posted at July 16, 2020 10:29:06PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at July 19, 2020 10:45:06PM EST by Christian Quiroz
|Category||Justin Suh||Sam L|
|Use of evidence:||3||3|
|Coherence of arguments:||5||4.5|
|Responsiveness to opponent:||5.5||4|
|Identification of key points:||5.5||4|
|Comments:||I think you do a really great job throughout this debate but try to tone down the banter. I think you could be a bit more sportsmanlike!||I think you made great arguments in the 2nd speech, but try to include those in the first. In addition, try to focus on a fewer points in the second speech and explain how they can help you win the overall debate.|
The decision is for the Proposition: Justin Suh
Reason for Decision:
I vote PROP because I think that the best OPP arguments are a bit late-breaking, specifically that we should just try to help certain countries with CJS reform (without a universal standard) and the fact that discussing a universal standard could probably lead to international war/conflicts. If the OPP mentioned these arguments in the first speech as well as made them clear with some examples, then the debate would be much closer! But I vote PROP because I think the PROP has won it is good to set expectations for well-developed countries to try to reform CJS’s that are based on oppressive culture (racism in particular is mentioned).