Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Justin Suh (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Sam L (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Christian Quiroz (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Justin Suh
    Justin Suh
    vs.



    Sam L
    Sam L
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 14, 2020 04:56:08AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    (Document where all citations are listed)

    Posted at July 14, 2020 11:47:04PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/index.html

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/criminaljusticereform.html

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/frontpage/2013/January/strengthening-criminal-justice-systems-across-the-world.html

    Posted at July 16, 2020 02:54:14AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    Same google doc from constructive.

    Posted at July 16, 2020 10:29:06PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show


    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/index.html

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/criminaljusticereform.html

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/frontpage/2013/January/strengthening-criminal-justice-systems-across-the-world.html

    Posted at July 18, 2020 04:44:12AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    Same as before.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 19, 2020 10:45:06PM EST by Christian Quiroz

    Category Justin Suh Sam L
    Use of evidence: 3 3
    Delivery skill: 5 4.5
    Coherence of arguments: 5 4.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5.5 4
    Identification of key points: 5.5 4
    Comments: I think you do a really great job throughout this debate but try to tone down the banter. I think you could be a bit more sportsmanlike! I think you made great arguments in the 2nd speech, but try to include those in the first. In addition, try to focus on a fewer points in the second speech and explain how they can help you win the overall debate.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Justin Suh

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote PROP because I think that the best OPP arguments are a bit late-breaking, specifically that we should just try to help certain countries with CJS reform (without a universal standard) and the fact that discussing a universal standard could probably lead to international war/conflicts. If the OPP mentioned these arguments in the first speech as well as made them clear with some examples, then the debate would be much closer! But I vote PROP because I think the PROP has won it is good to set expectations for well-developed countries to try to reform CJS’s that are based on oppressive culture (racism in particular is mentioned).


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT