Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Shreeram Saravanan (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: David Jen (The Wilberforce School)

Judge: Morgan Copeland (Liberty University)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Shreeram Saravanan
    Shreeram Saravanan
    vs.



    David Jen
    David Jen
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 7, 2020 01:19:00AM EST by Shreeram Saravanan

    Citations

    Show

    Interpol.Ind
    GoodReads.com
    LegalBegal.com

    Posted at July 7, 2020 08:06:17PM EST by David Jen

    Citations

    Show

    inquiriesjournal.com
    scholarship.law.duke.edu
    www.justia.com
    Direct Conversation with Dr. Janet Holl Madigan.
    nevadacsi.com
    pbs.org
    criminallegalnews.org
    innocenceproject.org
    nytimes.com

    Posted at July 9, 2020 01:26:27AM EST by Shreeram Saravanan

    Citations

    Show

    pbs.org
    nationalgeographic.com
    unodc.org
    theverge.com

    Posted at July 9, 2020 09:00:57PM EST by David Jen

    Citations

    Show

    un.org
    inquiry journal
    justia.com
    pbs.org

    Posted at July 11, 2020 01:11:21AM EST by Shreeram Saravanan

    Citations

    Show

    all are my points

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 11, 2020 11:54:17PM EST by Morgan Copeland

    Category Shreeram Saravanan David Jen
    Use of evidence: 3.9 3.7
    Delivery skill: 3.7 3.8
    Coherence of arguments: 3.7 3.7
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.5 4
    Identification of key points: 3.6 3.9
    Comments: Hey good debate I think one of your bigger problems in this debate is answering this argument about how forensic science reform has already been adopted in countries and has been shown that is is mad through mix ups in the labs and fabrication of evidence by the researchers in the lab. Hey good debate I think that one of the areas that you excelled in this debate is showing why the uniformity of a criminal justice reform has not been helpful in the present so how could it be helpful on a larger scale.

    The decision is for the Opposition: David Jen

    Reason for Decision:

    Good debate I voted for the opposition because they have made arguments about why countries should not adopt criminal justice reform that were not answered such as it is too expensive for most countries, and has been proven not to work in the past because of the many complications that come with it.


    2 Comments

    Good job Shreeram Saravanan! Nice debate! Thank you, Morgan Copeland! - David Jen on July 12, 2020 at 07:52AM EST
    Congratulations David! - Lucas Hinds on July 12, 2020 at 12:06AM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT