Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Emma Yamashita (American School In Japan) vs. Opposition: Justin Suh (Leaders Academy)

Judge: Isaac Liu (Liberty University)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Emma Yamashita
    Emma Yamashita
    vs.



    Justin Suh
    Justin Suh
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 7, 2020 02:28:09AM EST by Emma Yamashita

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/george-floyd-investigation.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMGBx3Zx_Sg

    Posted at July 7, 2020 11:50:18PM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    Will update later.

    Posted at July 9, 2020 03:46:45AM EST by Emma Yamashita

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 10, 2020 04:52:07AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    Link to Sources: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o2ZuvkOyYecXw4oBZmlcy1sPK34l86387uNH47ztxrU/edit?usp=sharing

    BTW, at the end of my speech, I meant proud to oppose, my bad lol.

    Posted at July 11, 2020 04:28:04AM EST by Emma Yamashita

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 12, 2020 12:30:22PM EST by Isaac Liu

    Category Emma Yamashita Justin Suh
    Use of evidence: 3.5 3.5
    Delivery skill: 4 5
    Coherence of arguments: 4.1 5.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.1 6
    Identification of key points: 4 6
    Comments: See the video I shot. I think the biggest issue is that you need reasons inherent to the United Nations.

    You delivery and confidence is good, but do use all your time.
    Phenomenal job. I have a few critiques, see the video I've recorded. Organization is excellent, but can be improved further.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Justin Suh

    Reason for Decision:

    TLDR; I voted in negation because the negative is winning a uniqueness claim of developed nations implementing some reform now and that the UN would be too homogenizing.

    Video from the judge:


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT