Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Jared Sul (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: David Kim (Colin Powell Elementary School)

Judge: Kate McGrath (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Jared Sul
    Jared Sul
    vs.



    David Kim
    David Kim
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 5, 2020 09:00:03PM EST by Jared Sul

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 7, 2020 03:58:09PM EST by David Kim

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 8, 2020 07:07:24PM EST by Jared Sul

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 9, 2020 09:05:09PM EST by David Kim

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 10, 2020 02:48:21AM EST by Jared Sul

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 11, 2020 01:28:24PM EST by Kate McGrath

    Category Jared Sul David Kim
    Use of evidence: 3 3
    Delivery skill: 4 3.6
    Coherence of arguments: 4 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.7 4.7
    Identification of key points: 4.5 4.4
    Comments: While you do a good job of defending your position, you do need to confirm to the rules. You should be more mindful of time limits. You make some good points in your last speech; you should foreground them earlier in the speech.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Jared Sul

    Reason for Decision:

    I think the time limits are an issue, and I consider it closely. In the end, the opposition needed to give me more of a reason for why it's an automatic disqualification rather than justifying the opposition also going over. In terms of the merits of the argument, the opposition doesn't answer the proposition's argument that it wouldn't apply to good systems, only the UN can compel the US, and criminal justice is a human rights issue.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT