Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Sameera Velicheti (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Yash Banerjee (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Jeremiah Sekyi (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Sameera Velicheti
    Sameera Velicheti
    vs.



    Yash Banerjee
    Yash Banerjee
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 7, 2020 12:02:48AM EST by Sameera Velicheti

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 7, 2020 09:16:35PM EST by Yash Banerjee

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 8, 2020 10:54:10PM EST by Sameera Velicheti

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 9, 2020 08:55:44PM EST by Yash Banerjee

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 10, 2020 08:46:01PM EST by Sameera Velicheti

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 10, 2020 11:48:14PM EST by Jeremiah Sekyi

    Category Sameera Velicheti Yash Banerjee
    Use of evidence: 4.5 3
    Delivery skill: 4 3.5
    Coherence of arguments: 4 4.2
    Responsiveness to opponent: 2.5 3.5
    Identification of key points: 3.5 4
    Comments: Congratulations on a well delivered speech. Your confidence and eloquence were evident. Moving forward, you could do better by analysing the motion beyond just the problem and engaging your opponent's arguments head-on instead of restating your own claims. You delivered important arguments and listening to your speech was enjoyable. Your speeches could do with more evidence to back your claims as well as more engagement in rebuttal.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Sameera Velicheti

    Reason for Decision:

    Both speakers left much of the burden of the debate out of their speeches i.e Proposition relied mainly on the necessity of the action while Opposition relied mainly on feasibility. The lack of engagement meant that the debate in the end rested on use of evidence and quality of delivery which Proposition excelled at.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT