Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Joshua Jen (The Wilberforce School) vs. Opposition: Shreeram Saravanan (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Eric Kazadi (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Joshua Jen
    Joshua Jen

    Shreeram Saravanan
    Shreeram Saravanan
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at July 6, 2020 09:06:15PM EST by Joshua Jen



    arg 1:

    arg 2:
    Charter of the United Nation Chapter I


    Posted at July 8, 2020 12:32:51AM EST by Shreeram Saravanan



    Posted at July 8, 2020 03:10:50PM EST by Joshua Jen



    Posted at July 10, 2020 12:48:51AM EST by Shreeram Saravanan


    Proof :: We cannot enforce the same law throughout the world ::: below

    Posted at July 10, 2020 11:06:02AM EST by Joshua Jen



    Anthony L. Bui, UCLA, Matthew M. Coates, Harvard University, and Ellicott C. Matthay, UC Berkeley. Published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

    Frank Edwards, of Rutgers University’s School of Criminal Justice, Hedwig Lee, of Washington University in St. Louis’s Department of Sociology, and Michael Esposito, of the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 12, 2020 12:11:37PM EST by Eric Kazadi

    Category Joshua Jen Shreeram Saravanan
    Use of evidence: 4.5 3
    Delivery skill: 4 2
    Coherence of arguments: 3.5 2.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.5 2.7
    Identification of key points: 3.5 3.4
    Comments: You need to show why the UN is a legitimate body to force this reform and also prove a regulation mechanism. You need to be more responsive and show why and how individual states can enact these reforms.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Joshua Jen

    Reason for Decision:

    I think this debate was based really on the single issue - which is whether or not as the is a need for the intervention.

    The opposition says that individual states can deal with this and uses the example of body cams in the US but this does not respond to the idea that universal will overall improve policing systems and either protect victims or give them justice at the least.

    I think the opposition only tries to mitigate the benefits on prop as opposed to furthering solid substantive material. Also be wary of unsubstantiated claims like people in Africa and Asia do not have guns.

    1 Comment

    Thank you for judging the round, Mr. Kazadi! - Joshua Jen on July 12, 2020 at 05:26PM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: