Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Justin Suh (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Ramona Chuang (Springman )

Judge: María Odériz (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Justin Suh
    Justin Suh
    vs.



    Ramona Chuang
    Ramona Chuang
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at June 30, 2020 03:29:13AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    (This is the google doc with all of my citations! -- I may update this as our debate progresses)

    Posted at July 1, 2020 03:27:35AM EST by Ramona Chuang

    Citations

    Show

    Sorry I don’t know if I posted it already so this is a link again

    Posted at July 2, 2020 04:15:37AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    (This is the google doc with all of my citations! -- I may update this as our debate progresses)

    Posted at July 2, 2020 11:51:26PM EST by Ramona Chuang

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 4, 2020 02:42:10AM EST by Justin Suh

    Citations

    Show

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zJWVNN5s19i7EbnXRPcw5GWsyS7uT_DlCYY0zWYjou0/edit?usp=sharing

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 4, 2020 09:48:22AM EST by María Odériz

    Category Justin Suh Ramona Chuang
    Use of evidence: 6 3
    Delivery skill: 5.4 4
    Coherence of arguments: 5.6 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 6 1.8
    Identification of key points: 6 4
    Comments: Really good speeches! Congratulations. Here you have a link to a pdf document with your individual feedback: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OkQEmWeShyvWkqEQcF1cEUO5nyQhu6mg/view?usp=sharing Thank you for your speeches! I really enjoyed hearing your arguments. Here you have a link to a pdf document with individual feedback:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WfNoanoaKhjgORerLh3iV8yBTBxWmWQu/view?usp=sharing

    The decision is for the Proposition: Justin Suh

    Reason for Decision:

    Thank you both for this awesome debate. The debate goes to proposition because they brought a case more logically sound and with clear consequences. See video below to listen to my reasoning!

    Video from the judge:


    1 Comment

    In case you cannot see the individual feedback clearly.

    Justin Suh:
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OkQEmWeShyvWkqEQcF1cEUO5nyQhu6mg/view?usp=sharing

    Ramona Chuang: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WfNoanoaKhjgORerLh3iV8yBTBxWmWQu/view?usp=sharing


    And this is my email: maria.oderiz@gmail.com - María Odériz on July 4, 2020 at 09:49AM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT