Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Ava Angeles (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Albert Khawam (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Saianurag Karavadi (New York University)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Ava Angeles
    Ava Angeles

    Albert Khawam
    Albert Khawam
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at June 29, 2020 06:52:58PM EST by Ava Angeles



    Equal Justice Initiative:

    United Nations:

    Posted at June 30, 2020 09:41:41PM EST by Albert Khawam



    Posted at July 1, 2020 07:45:37PM EST by Ava Angeles



    Forensic science is putting innocent people in prison:

    Forensic science may not be completely reliable:

    Posted at July 2, 2020 11:46:20AM EST by Albert Khawam



    Posted at July 3, 2020 06:50:15PM EST by Ava Angeles



    Forensic science putting innocent people in jail:

    Criminal Justice Reform:


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 5, 2020 12:05:38AM EST by Saianurag Karavadi

    Category Ava Angeles Albert Khawam
    Use of evidence: 4.2 2
    Delivery skill: 4 3
    Coherence of arguments: 5 2.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5 2
    Identification of key points: 5 2.5
    Comments: I really enjoyed listening to your speeches and thought they were well developed and argued!! Focus a little more on the evidence, do some more research to accurately understand mass incarceration, and make sure you negate the aff. Nonetheless, I appreciated the opportunity to judge you and think you're a great debater!!

    The decision is for the Proposition: Ava Angeles

    Reason for Decision:

    I think the aff has won this round because they have proven that sentencing reform is good. I think the neg is proving why forensic science might be useful or good, but is not answering the aff responses and isn't accurately explaining the relationship between mass incarceration and either side's arguments. The aff has also pointed out a contradiction in the neg arguments. Finally, the biggest issue is that the neg has not proved sentencing reform isn't a good idea or that forensic science reform is somehow better while also being mutually exclusive with the aff (if they can happen at the same time, then there is no reason forensic science being good would mean that we shouldn't affirm that sentencing reform is good).

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: