Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Emiliano del Rio (Virgina shuman young) vs. Opposition: Emma Yamashita (American School In Japan)

Judge: Ian Miller (University of Oklahoma)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Emiliano del Rio
    Emiliano del Rio
    vs.



    Emma Yamashita
    Emma Yamashita
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at June 29, 2020 08:56:48PM EST by Emiliano del Rio

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/prison-reform-and-alternatives-to-imprisonment.html

    Posted at July 1, 2020 04:24:02AM EST by Emma Yamashita

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 2, 2020 01:44:46PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 3, 2020 04:03:04AM EST by Emma Yamashita

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.businessinsider.com/sea-level-rise-3-feet-in-80-years-un-report-2019-9

    Posted at July 3, 2020 10:46:53AM EST by Emiliano del Rio

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/overview/index.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 5, 2020 12:37:49PM EST by Ian Miller

    Category Emiliano del Rio Emma Yamashita
    Use of evidence: 4.3 4.6
    Delivery skill: 4.3 4.3
    Coherence of arguments: 3.9 4.2
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.6 4.5
    Identification of key points: 4.1 4.2
    Comments: You were a good speaker - I liked your quotes but I think you should consider outlining specific parts of the criminal justice system that are bad. Good debate - I liked how you used the climate change example against the proposition. However, you probably spent too much time on that and could instead spend time proving why the criminal justice system isn't as bad as they think.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Emma Yamashita

    Reason for Decision:

    Good debate!

    I voted for the opposition. I think that in this debate the proposition would benefit from talking about out the possible bad parts of the criminal justice system that need to be reformed and the opposition would benefit from contesting those. This level of specificity is more persuasive to me than more vague arguments.

    I voted for the opposition because of the harms of inter-country conflict arising from the UN taking action. It was a very close debate and if both teams would provide more specific points that might change the outcome.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT