Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Walter Hatridge (Leaders Academy) vs. Opposition: Daniel Ju (Unaffiliated)

Judge: Eric Kazadi (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: The United Nation should require countries to uniformly enact substantial criminal justice reform in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, sentencing.

  • Walter Hatridge
    Walter Hatridge

    Daniel  Ju
    Daniel Ju
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at June 29, 2020 12:06:38PM EST by Walter Hatridge



    Dr Ian D Marder of Maynooth University Department of Law,

    John Dickerson's new book The Hardest Job in the World: The American Presidency

    The Innocence Project

    Posted at June 30, 2020 11:23:17AM EST by Daniel Ju


    Show, Forensic Science Center Construction Cost, List of Least Developed Countries

    World bank, Afghanistan

    Posted at July 2, 2020 01:17:58AM EST by Walter Hatridge



    None available for this speech.

    Posted at July 2, 2020 07:54:29PM EST by Daniel Ju



    It works fine here and you should be able access it with the link given above.

    Posted at July 3, 2020 11:50:56PM EST by Walter Hatridge



    None available for this speech.


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at July 6, 2020 07:39:12AM EST by Eric Kazadi

    Category Walter Hatridge Daniel Ju
    Use of evidence: 3.5 3
    Delivery skill: 3.6 3.4
    Coherence of arguments: 3.9 3.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 3.7
    Identification of key points: 3 3
    Comments: In your first speech, I think you needed to have stronger principled justification of why the UN is a legitimate body to enforce this kind of policy. In future, always double check that your upload is working correctly so as to prevent a situation such as this.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Walter Hatridge

    Reason for Decision:

    Unfortunately, the debate could not transpire as intended. I could play the opposition constructive video now as I was judging but there is video evidence that it was unavailable at some point. I, therefore, have no choice but to count this as a forfeiture from the opposition because the onus is on the speaker to ensure that their video upload is proper. The scores are a reflection of the quality of the first speeches on both sides which I could play.

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: