Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Katelyn Jeon (Churchill Junior High) vs. Opposition: Helen Maag (HB Woodlawn)

Judge: Murphy Fauci (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Katelyn Jeon
    Katelyn Jeon
    vs.



    Helen Maag
    Helen Maag
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 25, 2020 07:36:58PM EST by Katelyn Jeon

    Citations

    Show

    statista.com
    lirs.org

    Posted at May 26, 2020 06:26:53PM EST by Helen Maag

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-crime/violent-crime-rises-in-germany-and-is-attributed-to-refugees-idUSKBN1ES16J
    https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/the-rising-tide-migrants-and-refugees-due-diligence-and-adherence-law-required

    Posted at May 27, 2020 10:08:27PM EST by Katelyn Jeon

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 28, 2020 06:08:40PM EST by Helen Maag

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/overview-us-refugee-law-and-policy

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/25/migrant-crime-germany-rises-50-per-cent-new-figures-show/


    https://www.investopedia.com/insights/worlds-top-economies/

    Posted at May 29, 2020 05:32:56PM EST by Katelyn Jeon

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 30, 2020 11:04:24PM EST by Murphy Fauci

    Category Katelyn Jeon Helen Maag
    Use of evidence: 4.5 3
    Delivery skill: 3.7 2.9
    Coherence of arguments: 3.4 3.6
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.8 4.4
    Identification of key points: 4.8 4
    Comments: Good debate, I think you both focused too much on how your opponent was responding rather than what they were arguing. Also you both need to identify your arguments more clearly and stick to it. Good debate, I think you both focused too much on how your opponent was responding rather than what they were arguing. Also you both need to identify your arguments more clearly and stick to it.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Katelyn Jeon

    Reason for Decision:

    I am voting for the proposition, because the opposition did not advocate enough for her side. The proposition gave more evidence and clearly identified her points.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT