Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Sophie Chen (Maryknoll Convent School (Primary Section)) vs. Opposition: Helen Maag (HB Woodlawn)

Judge: Mike Davis (James Madison University)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Sophie Chen
    Sophie Chen
    vs.



    Helen Maag
    Helen Maag
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 08:13:29AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-energy

    Posted at May 19, 2020 07:08:56PM EST by Helen Maag

    Citations

    Show

    https://sciencing.com/about-6134607-nuclear-energy-vs--fossil-fuel.html
    https://newestcorp.com/nuclear-solution-fossil-fuel/
    http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/8/16/renewables-cant-save-the-planet-only-nuclear-can
    https://www.who.int/airpollution/news-and-events/how-air-pollution-is-destroying-our-health

    Posted at May 20, 2020 12:14:22PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.ecotricity.co.uk/our-green-energy/energy-independence/the-end-of-fossil-fuels

    Posted at May 21, 2020 06:30:32PM EST by Helen Maag

    Citations

    Show

    same as before

    Posted at May 24, 2020 09:51:55AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    forfeit

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 24, 2020 08:27:34PM EST by Mike Davis

    Category Sophie Chen Helen Maag
    Use of evidence: 2.6 3
    Delivery skill: 2.7 4.2
    Coherence of arguments: 1.9 4.1
    Responsiveness to opponent: 1 4.1
    Identification of key points: 3 5.4
    Comments: You need to use your time more effectively. You only have one source in your first speech. You do a very good job laying out the debate by explaining that nuclear power in an expanded arena is problematic.

    Make sure you are citing the sources that you use. You list sources, but you need to make sure you include those in your speech.

    The place that you are the strongest is in the impacting of your arguments. You do a good job telling me why your arguments matter!

    The decision is for the Opposition: Helen Maag

    Reason for Decision:

    The proposition did not present their final speech.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT