Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Ramon Perez Flaquer (Colegio Bilingüe New Horizons) vs. Opposition: andrew cui (William Annin Middle School)

Judge: Catherine Marin (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Ramon Perez Flaquer
    Ramon Perez Flaquer
    vs.



    andrew cui
    andrew cui
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 06:59:26PM EST by Ramon Perez Flaquer

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 19, 2020 09:11:17PM EST by andrew cui

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 07:35:18PM EST by Ramon Perez Flaquer

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 21, 2020 07:28:49PM EST by andrew cui

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 22, 2020 07:23:06PM EST by Ramon Perez Flaquer

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 24, 2020 04:11:43PM EST by Catherine Marin

    Category Ramon Perez Flaquer andrew cui
    Use of evidence: 5.5 4.5
    Delivery skill: 5 4.5
    Coherence of arguments: 4.5 4.6
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 5
    Identification of key points: 4 5.3
    Comments: You did a very good job in this round, but ultimately I think you spread yourself a little too thin in the final speech. I don't end up getting an answer to things like the trade war and current events making the research and production process more difficult, or to the idea of uranium shortages in your final speech. You had good answers, but you need to work on extending them more clearly and doing more explicit impact calc.

    The decision is for the Opposition: andrew cui

    Reason for Decision:

    I end up voting on the probability of being able to achieve nuclear energy. I think the aff needs to answer the trade war and uranium shortages. I also don't hear a good explanation of 700 year lifespans vs 60 year lifespans from the aff, which I think was pretty necessary.


    1 Comment

    Thanks to both of you for the round. - Ramon Perez Flaquer on May 24, 2020 at 04:48PM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT