Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Eesha Kodali (Novi Middle School) vs. Opposition: Chris Mok (Unaffiliated)

Judge: Lindsey Hancock Warden (University Middle School)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Eesha Kodali
    Eesha Kodali

    Chris Mok
    Chris Mok
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 05:20:38PM EST by Eesha Kodali


    Show /

    Posted at May 19, 2020 11:12:56PM EST by Chris Mok



    Posted at May 20, 2020 05:27:44PM EST by Eesha Kodali



    Posted at May 21, 2020 08:20:13PM EST by Chris Mok



    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 22, 2020 04:02:42PM EST by Eesha Kodali




    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 24, 2020 10:02:02PM EST by Lindsey Hancock Warden

    Category Eesha Kodali Chris Mok
    Use of evidence: 4.7 2.5
    Delivery skill: 4.7 4.5
    Coherence of arguments: 5 4.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5 5
    Identification of key points: 4.5 4.3
    Comments: You do a really nice job of incorporating evidence and explaining it clearly. I like the way that you organize your speeches very well, it was easy to follow. I am not a big fan of the time abuse argument. Ten seconds is not a very big overage, but if you want to make this a voter, I would suggest listing the violation and explaining the impacts. I love your speaking style and the way that you introduce your rebuttals with the analysis on top. It is smart to collapse her arguments in your rebuttal. I would have liked to see you put a little more offense on the flow in your first constructive.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Eesha Kodali

    Reason for Decision:

    I end up voting for the proposition in this round. I buy the argument that nuclear energy is better for developing nations to implement immediately, and more reliable overall. I think she warrants her arguments better with evidence, increasing her credibility in the round. Both debaters have a great delivery style and I enjoyed this debate.

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: