Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Katey-Anne Clark (Molly Ockett Middle School) vs. Opposition: Suraj Shah (The Pegasus School)

Judge: Michelle Thomas (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Katey-Anne  Clark
    Katey-Anne Clark
    vs.



    Suraj Shah
    Suraj Shah
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 09:38:03PM EST by Katey-Anne Clark

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-energy

    https://www.renewableresourcescoalition.org/nuclear-energy-advantages/

    https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-nuclear-power-must-be-part-of-the-energy-solution-environmentalists-climate

    Posted at May 20, 2020 01:33:53AM EST by Suraj Shah

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 09:15:12PM EST by Katey-Anne Clark

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.fauske.com/blog/cost-benefit-analysis-of-nuclear-power-plants

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120522134942.htm

    Posted at May 22, 2020 01:36:11AM EST by Suraj Shah

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 22, 2020 08:43:31PM EST by Katey-Anne Clark

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fossil-fuels-dirty-facts
    Not wikipedia, probably the most unreliable source that I am never allowed to use for school projects.... ;) gg, Suraj. GG.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 23, 2020 08:37:20PM EST by Michelle Thomas

    Category Katey-Anne Clark Suraj Shah
    Use of evidence: 3.8 3.3
    Delivery skill: 4.2 4.5
    Coherence of arguments: 3.8 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4 4
    Identification of key points: 4 4.6
    Comments: Good use of evidence.

    Make sure to answer both arguments in the final speech! You need to refute the argument that building a plant would cost billions of dollars.
    Good delivery.

    You keep saying the sources are biased but you have to actually explain why that matters - they might be biased but that doesn't mean their information is wrong.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Suraj Shah

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote for the opposition - there is no answer to the argument that nuclear fuel will run out and that it will cost a lot of money.


    2 Comments

    Yeah GG Katey-Anne you did great too - Suraj Shah on May 25, 2020 at 01:20PM EST
    gg suraj you did good have fun - Katey-Anne Clark on May 24, 2020 at 09:34AM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT