Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Chris Mok (Unaffiliated) vs. Opposition: Seralena Leeson-Schatz (Binghamton West Middle)

Judge: Arturo Feliz (Colegio Bilingüe New Horizons)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Chris Mok
    Chris Mok

    Seralena Leeson-Schatz
    Seralena Leeson-Schatz
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 19, 2020 12:13:25AM EST by Chris Mok



    Posted at May 19, 2020 10:05:49PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz



    Posted at May 20, 2020 08:58:27PM EST by Chris Mok



    Posted at May 21, 2020 11:58:01PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz



    Personal Note for Chris -


    Posted at May 22, 2020 08:25:12PM EST by Chris Mok



    None available for this speech.


    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 23, 2020 07:08:30PM EST by Arturo Feliz

    Category Chris Mok Seralena Leeson-Schatz
    Use of evidence: 2.7 2.3
    Delivery skill: 3.4 2.5
    Coherence of arguments: 3 2
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.4 2.7
    Identification of key points: 3 2.7
    Comments: Chris Good delivery. I like your place and clarity. You offered a clear framework.

    I'm honestly not sure why you choose to go after wind and solar when the topical choice seemed to be to run nuclear against fossil.

    I think this was a risk, as I would usually not allow the app to run it because I'd feel it not to be topical, but since you opened the door, it was fair game.

    A well built green case could have been hard to defeat.
    Seralena It was a lot of fun to watch you debate.

    I think you probably would benefit from researching your arguments a bit more. I feel that things were set up for you to take the round when Chris opened the gate for solar and wind.

    I felt if you ran the environmental benefits, the harms of nuclear would have made that case hard to buy.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Chris Mok

    Reason for Decision:

    RFD Proposition offered efficiency+green

    Since it was not contested I'm going with it. I feel nuclear wins clearly the efficiency arguments. The green argument should have been easy to win for the opposition but things got a little muddy there with indoor wind and solar facilities, and then with the smelly stuff. I honestly giggled a bit there and opposition was gracious enough to concede it.

    Finally I see that a lot of time was spent on the cutting corners argument, which I feel is a wash.

    I'm going with prop on this one. You're both awesome! Keep up the good work!

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by: