Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Dalia Gerber (PS89) vs. Opposition: Heather Cheung (Marymount Primary School)

Judge: Murphy Fauci (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Finals Week: Kids should get to set their own bedtimes.

  • Dalia Gerber
    Dalia Gerber
    vs.



    Heather Cheung
    Heather Cheung
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 11:36:45PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 07:52:32AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 09:38:03PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 09:38:03PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 22, 2020 10:41:22PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 23, 2020 09:27:41PM EST by Murphy Fauci

    Category Dalia Gerber Heather Cheung
    Use of evidence: 4.2 4.3
    Delivery skill: 5.1 4.9
    Coherence of arguments: 4.2 4.3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 5.4
    Identification of key points: 4.4 4.8
    Comments: awesome job you speak really well I think if you had just touched on your opponent's comment about the children being forced to give their candy you would have had my vote. awesome job Great responsiveness to your opponent your comment on why forcing the child would not be a great thing is what led me to choose you.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Heather Cheung

    Reason for Decision:

    I am voting for the opposition because the affirmative conceded The argument about why forcing children can have a negative effect rather than a positive one.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT