Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Julian Slive (A.D. Henderson School (FAU)) vs. Opposition: Tabby Byron (Unaffiliated)

Judge: Kathryn Rubino (U.S. Military Academy)

Resolution: Finals Week: Kids should get to set their own bedtimes.

  • Julian Slive
    Julian Slive
    vs.



    Tabby Byron
    Tabby Byron
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 18, 2020 06:15:52PM EST by Julian Slive

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 19, 2020 12:42:39PM EST by Tabby Byron

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00867/full

    https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180918-is-sugar-really-bad-for-you

    https://www.boldsky.com/aboutus.html

    https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=nrsEAQAAIAAJ - Wheeler v. R. Co., 31 Kan. 640, 3 P. 297, 300:

    Posted at May 20, 2020 09:48:56PM EST by Julian Slive

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.boldsky.com/pregnancy-parenting/kids/2014/ten-family-values-to-teach-kids-040641.html

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/prime-your-gray-cells/201110/why-sugar-high-leads-brain-low

    https://www.verywellfamily.com/forcing-your-kid-to-share-4126426

    https://childmind.org/article/pushing-kids-without-pushing-too-hard/

    https://www.mommyish.com/parents-steal-kids-halloween-candy/

    https://www.sleep.org/articles/sugar-impacts-sleep/

    Posted at May 21, 2020 05:46:06PM EST by Tabby Byron

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00867/full

    https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180918-is-sugar-really-bad-for-you

    https://www.boldsky.com/aboutus.html

    https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=nrsEAQAAIAAJ - Wheeler v. R. Co., 31 Kan. 640, 3 P. 297, 300:

    http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/hypoglycemia/

    Wolraich ML, Lindgren SD, Stumbo PJ, et al. Effects of diets high in sucrose or aspartame on the behavior and cognitive performance of children. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:301-307.

    https://www.diabetes.org.uk/guide-to-diabetes/enjoy-food/eating-with-diabetes/diabetes-food-myths/myth-sugar-causes-diabetes

    https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/in-depth/cancer-causes/art-20044714

    Posted at May 22, 2020 09:56:02PM EST by Julian Slive

    Citations

    Show

    https://news.sanfordhealth.org/healthy-living/sugar-crash-effects/

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324854

    https://family.findlaw.com/emancipation-of-minors/what-are-the-legal-rights-of-children.html

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 23, 2020 05:52:15PM EST by Kathryn Rubino

    Category Julian Slive Tabby Byron
    Use of evidence: 5.4 5.6
    Delivery skill: 5.1 5.1
    Coherence of arguments: 5 5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.3 4.5
    Identification of key points: 4.4 4.4
    Comments: Great job. In general you do a good job of responding to your opponent. But you need to respond to Tabby's argument about property rights in your second speech. Waiting until the last speech -- when she cannot respond -- is too late in the debate. Also you can work on responding to the nuance in your opponent's speech. Well done. I think you do well making distinctions between your opponent's arguments and the point you are trying to make. You can work on exploding the impacts you want the judge to vote on in the end of the round and framing them in terms of what you want the judge to vote on.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Tabby Byron

    Reason for Decision:

    Great job from both sides. One of the closest rounds I've judged this tournament. Ultimately I thing the proposition doesn't focus enough on the nuanced argument that forcing kids to share is different than sharing voluntarily or parents forcing kids to practice piano. The opposition argues it makes it less likely for kids to share in the future and that turns the proposition's generosity impact, which is framed as one of the most important.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT