Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Anna Rosenblatt (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Dalia Gerber (PS89)

Judge: Isaac Liu (Liberty University)

Resolution: Finals Week: Kids should get to set their own bedtimes.

  • Anna Rosenblatt
    Anna Rosenblatt
    vs.



    Dalia Gerber
    Dalia Gerber
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 17, 2020 09:52:49PM EST by Anna Rosenblatt

    Citations

    Show


    https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002426.htm

    Posted at May 20, 2020 10:58:47AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 20, 2020 10:33:43PM EST by Anna Rosenblatt

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 21, 2020 09:58:12PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 22, 2020 11:04:07PM EST by Anna Rosenblatt

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 24, 2020 01:31:46PM EST by Isaac Liu

    Category Anna Rosenblatt Dalia Gerber
    Use of evidence: 4 3
    Delivery skill: 4.3 4.3
    Coherence of arguments: 4.6 4.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4 3.5
    Identification of key points: 4.2 3.3
    Comments: Good job! Love the argumentation. If you want to bring it to the next level, number your arguments. For example you can say, "Argument 1: Sharing builds important life skills", and then go on to explain those arguments. That would bring your organization to the next level.

    Also, it would be good to use more evidence. You used some evidence, but using more would be helpful. It would also be helpful to reference it in later speeches.

    Regardless, good job and good luck!

    Good job! Love the argumentation. If you want to bring it to the next level, number your arguments. For example you can say, "Argument 1: Candy is unhealthy", and then go on to explain those arguments. That would bring your organization to the next level.

    Also, it would be good to use more evidence. You used some evidence, but using more would be helpful. It would also be helpful to reference it in later speeches.

    Most importantly, be sure to respond to every argument and remember the resolution. It is about kids sharing candy with their parents, not with other kids. A lot of your arguments were not specific to kids sharing candy with their parents.

    Regardless, good job and good luck!

    The decision is for the Proposition: Anna Rosenblatt

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote in proposition because 1. the proposition is the only side to have evidence 2. the proposition has defense to the germ-sharing argument and offense on the candy is unhealthy argument (sharing means kids eat less) with an unanswered argument about how learning to share is good and parents know best.

    The opposition needs to respond to the argument that sharing is good in the final speech -- or argue that being forced to share ruins the educational benefit of sharing.

    Good debate, and good luck the rest of the tournament!


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT