Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Zoha Askari (University Middle School) vs. Opposition: Yuheng Tao (Shorin Global)

Judge: Arturo Feliz (Colegio Bilingüe New Horizons)

Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.

  • Zoha Askari
    Zoha Askari
    vs.



    Yuheng Tao
    Yuheng Tao
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 11, 2020 08:41:14PM EST by Zoha Askari

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/13/more-americans-say-government-should-ensure-health-care-coverage/

    https://www.thoughtco.com/pros-and-cons-of-government-healthcare-3325379

    https://www.thebalance.com/universal-health-care-4156211

    https://healthcare.procon.org/

    Posted at May 12, 2020 01:16:20AM EST by Yuheng Tao

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 13, 2020 08:52:27PM EST by Zoha Askari

    Citations

    Show

    Same as first prop speech! :-)

    Posted at May 14, 2020 05:04:00AM EST by Yuheng Tao

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 15, 2020 10:22:57PM EST by Zoha Askari

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 16, 2020 11:10:14AM EST by Arturo Feliz

    Category Zoha Askari Yuheng Tao
    Use of evidence: 5 1.6
    Delivery skill: 5 2.2
    Coherence of arguments: 5 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5 2.3
    Identification of key points: 5 2.6
    Comments: Outstanding delivery. Excellent use of evidence.

    Very job good linking, impacting, and focusing in your case strengths.

    Liked your case organization. It was easy to follow up your rationale, argumentation and narrative.
    I loved your spirit. Keep working in developing your skills. I recommend a more solid use of evidence to back up your claims.

    Even at value type debate, I feel you need to develop the narrative more. I need to hear a story. Speak of a series of possible consequences (harms) Give me something to vote on. I feel like you kept yourself to the cost argument.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Zoha Askari

    Reason for Decision:

    Proposition. Excellent case. I feel you missed an opportunity by leaving China and India on the table instead of turning them. (Since they already have some type of Universal Healthcare)

    Opposition. You need more evidence and development of your narrative.

    Most of prop's arguments went unanswered, so I'm left with no real choice.

    Good job prop, nice effort op. Keep working. This is a process, and it takes a long time to become really good at it. Just keep working!


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT