Judge: Joe Leeson-Schatz (Binghamton University)
Resolution: Finals Week: This House Believes that Animal Testing Should be Banned.
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at May 12, 2020 06:39:54PM EST by Mai Kurihara
None available for this speech.
Posted at May 15, 2020 01:54:16AM EST by Mai Kurihara
None available for this speech.
Posted at May 15, 2020 08:30:59PM EST by Mya Navarro
Cale, E. (2019, December 05). What Is Bad About Universal Health Care? Retrieved
May 10, 2020, from https://www.leaf.tv/4900109/what-is-bad-about-universal-health-care/
Richardson, K. (n.d.). Health care is not a universal human right. Retrieved May 10,
2020, from https://dailyevergreen.com/35299/opinion/healthcare-is-not-a-universal-human-right/
Luthra, S. (2019, October 16). Poor People Are Still Sicker Than the Rich in Germany,
Despite Universal Health Care. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/16/770442938/poor-people-are-still-sicker-than-the-rich-in-germany-despite-universal-health-c
Why health care is not a 'right'. (2017, April 30). Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/30/health-care-is-not-a-right/
Hoffman, A. (2020, April 01). The threat of coronavirus medical bankruptcy. Retrieved
May 15, 2020, from https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/490168-the-threat-of-coronavirus-medical-bankruptcy
(n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/canadas-doctor-shortage-will-only-worsen-in-the-coming-decade
Pipes, S. (2018, September 14). Doctor Shortage Will Only Worsen Under Single
Payer. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/doctor-shortage-single-payer-nhs-2/
Low quality healthcare is increasing the burden of illness and health costs globally.
(n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/05-07-2018
New Research: Poor-Quality Health Care A Leading Killer. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15,
2020, from https://globalhealth.harvard.edu/NASEM_globalqualitychasm
Statistics Canada. (2015, November 27). Health at a Glance. Retrieved May 15, 2020,
Herman, B. (2019, September 16). Medical costs are driving millions of people into
poverty. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.axios.com/medical-expenses-
Financial Condition and Health Care Burdens of People in Deep Poverty. (2017,
February 21). Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/financial
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at May 21, 2020 09:19:05AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz
|Category||Mya Navarro||Mai Kurihara|
|Use of evidence:||3.4||3.3|
|Coherence of arguments:||4.6||4.5|
|Responsiveness to opponent:||5.1||5|
|Identification of key points:||4.1||3.4|
|Comments:||I wish you used the text box to provide citations so your opponent and judge could look at the sources you provide. When you're providing facts and statistics you need to at minimum say where your evidence in coming from in your speech. You do a good job at framing the debate in your speech. I like your COVID-19 contention on this topic. I would suggest trying to create a bigger terminal impact to your argument instead of just leaving it at a few people dying (which is bad, but you can create an internal link change that could get it to a bigger impact). Ie impact out your economic decline argument. Try to look at the camera more so you can better connect with the judge.
Great job framing how I should approach the ballot at the start of your speech, and responding to your opponent's speech. You do decent at starting some impact comparison in relation to your opponent's economy arguments. I like that you verbally provide cites in your speech but I still wish you had them in the provided box so I could review them. You use the personal narrative well to help your pathos in the round, and then teaming that story up with facts that back up your arguments.
I'd prefer you cites in your earlier speeches so it could be debated during the round. Don't just wait til the end.
|I would also suggest providing cites within the space provided instead of just listing them in your speech. It would allow for better clash over sources. I would also suggest speaking louder and/or closer to your microphone. Even with my volume all the way up it's hard to hear you. In a format like this, it's worth rewatching your video to make sure you can be heard and then rerecording it if you can't... or edit your video to make the sound louder. In terms of content, you make a lot of good arguments. You do need to impact them out more and start weighing why your cons against UHC outweigh the pros that your opponent brings up. Nice work referencing her arguments and answering them. I would just like to see some more impact comparison.
The sound is much better in this speech than your first. You do an excellent job at answering your opponent's arguments. However, you need to do a better job framing the round and explaining why your responses mean you win the round. Always start a closing speech off with, "I win the debate because" and then explain the argument you feel you should win the round on. Your speech provides a bunch of different arguments that I could vote on but none that are impacted out why I should vote on them. In each instance, you have a good response to your opponent's claim (ie can't be free) but you need to go the next step and win the impact. Also, again, I'd prefer it if you provided citations for your arguments.
The decision is for the Proposition: Mya Navarro
Reason for Decision:
I vote for the proposition because Mya does a better job framing the round and explaining why she deserves to win the round. I also think in regards to the citations debates that emerges in Mai's speech, I wish you both provided sources earlier so there can be clash. However, that being said, I do think that Mya provides enough warrants and explanation as to why UHC is desirable in light of the cornovirus. Mya's uses that impact to outweigh and turn any economic impacts from Mai, which wins her the round. I think framing the debate in the current political reality than as just a larger abstract question was a smart move by the proposition. I think the opposition does an excellent job pointing out responses and shortcomings in the proposition's speech, there needs to be a clearer strategy on why those arguments come together to produce a ballot. The proposition does this in her "framework" at the start of her second speech, which is extended into the closing.