Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Leo Verti (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Corisa Tam (Unaffiliated)

Judge: Taina Diaz (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Resolved: Governments should implement a meat tax.

  • Leo Verti
    Leo Verti
    vs.



    Corisa Tam
    Corisa Tam
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 27, 2020 11:20:18PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 28, 2020 10:36:13AM EST by Corisa Tam

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/sugary-drinks/

    Posted at April 29, 2020 09:53:57PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 30, 2020 02:02:56PM EST by Corisa Tam

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.eatright.org/food/nutrition/dietary-guidelines-and-myplate/sugar-does-it-really-cause-hyperactivity

    Posted at May 1, 2020 11:53:44PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 2, 2020 06:05:49PM EST by Taina Diaz

    Category Leo Verti Corisa Tam
    Use of evidence: 3.5 4.3
    Delivery skill: 2 4.2
    Coherence of arguments: 2.4 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 1.9
    Identification of key points: 3.6 3.7
    Comments: I like the way you identify the argument Corisa makes out loud, and then respond to it directly. In your rebuttal. Start by answering her points, but then use the rest of your speech time to tell me the impacts I should be voting for. You are making some good points in the opposition constructive speech, but they are not exactly defending the point that sugary drinks shouldn't be in schools. Ex: Banning sugary drinks does not allow students to learn to make their own decisions. This is probably true, but actually proves the proposition's point.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Corisa Tam

    Reason for Decision:

    Corisa is doing more impacting of her arguments. She is explaining in her speeches why it is that Leo's arguments don't matter or why hers are important and a reason why I should vote for the opposition.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT