Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Meadow Kennedy (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Allison Park (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Hongsheng Li (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: Resolved: Governments should implement a meat tax.

  • Meadow Kennedy
    Meadow Kennedy
    vs.



    Allison Park
    Allison Park
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 27, 2020 03:47:43PM EST by Meadow Kennedy

    Citations

    Show

    Sushmita Sengupta, “Sugary Drinks Could be Bad for Your Heart Health: Study”, February 27, 2020, https://food.ndtv.com/news/sugary-drinks-could-be-bad-for-heart-health-study-2186475

    Posted at April 29, 2020 12:20:48AM EST by Allison Park

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 29, 2020 06:13:27PM EST by Meadow Kennedy

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 30, 2020 05:49:44AM EST by Allison Park

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 1, 2020 10:55:17PM EST by Meadow Kennedy

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 3, 2020 09:52:36PM EST by Hongsheng Li

    Category Meadow Kennedy Allison Park
    Use of evidence: 5 5.5
    Delivery skill: 5 5
    Coherence of arguments: 6 6
    Responsiveness to opponent: 6 6
    Identification of key points: 5.5 5.5
    Comments: It's a very informative constructive and I like it very much! It's good for you to make your constructive logical, you told us how other evidences have proved about negative effects of sugary drink, and you have a list which showed us how's everything going to be if we have too much sugary drink. In your rebuttal, it is a very innovative angel to state that there should be a difference for a kid and an adult. You have made an amazing debate speech, you have great logic and using evidence to support your points. Also, you are good at seeking for innovative points to make rebuttals. It is an excellent debate. In your constructuive, Allison did a great job that you judged the reliability of your opponnet's source of evidence, that was really helpful. Also, you provided new evidence to support your own points. In your rebuttal, you said your opponnet didin't provide any cittaion, it was impressive. I like you said that studnets should keep the right of using their own money. Amaing debate speech!

    The decision is for the Opposition: Allison Park

    Reason for Decision:

    It is definitely a hard round to judge, both Meadow and Allison have shown perfect debate skills and informative speeches. After consideration, Allison wins this round. Meadow's points are great, but like what Allison said in her speech, it would be better if you have an oral citation. Allison had great angles in her speech, logical and clear.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT