Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Scarlett Quisenberry (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Lucas Hinds (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Taina Diaz (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Resolved: Governments should implement a meat tax.

  • Scarlett Quisenberry
    Scarlett Quisenberry
    vs.



    Lucas Hinds
    Lucas Hinds
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 27, 2020 10:28:52PM EST by Scarlett Quisenberry

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 28, 2020 11:20:52PM EST by Lucas Hinds

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 29, 2020 09:38:36PM EST by Scarlett Quisenberry

    Citations

    Show

    https://brandongaille.com/23-intriguing-vending-machine-sales-statistics/

    https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/sugary-drinks/

    Posted at April 30, 2020 10:03:49PM EST by Lucas Hinds

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 1, 2020 08:21:17PM EST by Scarlett Quisenberry

    Citations

    Show

    https://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/shpps/2006/summaries/pdf/HE_State_Level_Summaries_SHPPS2006.pdf

    https://healthland.time.com/2011/11/08/banning-sugared-drinks-in-schools-doesnt-lower-student-consumption/

    https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/liquid-sugar-calories#liquid-vs-solid-sugar

    https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 2, 2020 10:39:19PM EST by Taina Diaz

    Category Scarlett Quisenberry Lucas Hinds
    Use of evidence: 4.6 3.8
    Delivery skill: 3.3 4.1
    Coherence of arguments: 3.7 4.2
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5.8 2.5
    Identification of key points: 2.2 2.6
    Comments: I love that you start explaining your impact right from the first speech. The impact here is that how kids build healthy habits when they're young carries on into the future and causes disease. Good job giving me a roadmao of what I could expect from your argument. I also really enjoyed your point about vending machine companies being a place where schools get their funding from.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Scarlett Quisenberry

    Reason for Decision:

    Scarlett, you had impact analysis going for you in the first round and then in the second. You just had so many answers and reasoning. It was amazing. Lucas, you're doing a good job explaining your point but it's lacking impact analysis.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT