Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Daniel Hartford (Outschool Online - Intermediate) vs. Opposition: Xavier Edmead (Outschool Online - Intermediate)

Judge: Rachel Faerman (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Resolved: Governments should implement a meat tax.

  • Daniel Hartford
    Daniel Hartford
    vs.



    Xavier Edmead
    Xavier Edmead
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 27, 2020 10:41:08PM EST by Daniel Hartford

    Citations

    Show

    https://hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/sugary-drinks/

    Posted at April 28, 2020 07:40:49PM EST by Xavier Edmead

    Citations

    Show

    Poll shows most want sugary drinks banned from UK schools. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27254780

    Banning fizzy drinks in schools 'does not reduce children's intake'
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2059003/Banning-fizzy-drinks-schools-makes-difference-teenage-intake-finds-U-S-study.html

    School soda bans don't cut kids' consumption. https://www.asiaone.com/health/school-soda-bans-dont-cut-kids-consumption

    Banning sugary drinks in schools doesn’t lower student consumption. https://healthland.time.com/2011/11/08/banning-sugared-drinks-in-schools-doesnt-lower-student-consumption/

    Posted at April 29, 2020 09:58:39PM EST by Daniel Hartford

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 1, 2020 06:43:08AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    Banning Sugared Drinks in Schools Doesn’t Lower Student Consumption
    https://healthland.time.com/2011/11/08/banning-sugared-drinks-in-schools-doesnt-lower-student-consumption/

    Banning fizzy drinks in schools 'does not reduce children's intake'
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2059003/Banning-fizzy-drinks-schools-makes-difference-teenage-intake-finds-U-S-study.html

    Posted at May 1, 2020 08:46:41PM EST by Daniel Hartford

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 3, 2020 04:50:09PM EST by Rachel Faerman

    Category Daniel Hartford Xavier Edmead
    Use of evidence: 4.6 5.4
    Delivery skill: 4.8 4.7
    Coherence of arguments: 4 5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.4 3
    Identification of key points: 4.5 4.8
    Comments: He did a good job preseting his argument. He was also very responsive to his opponent. His arguments would have been stronger with more evidence. Very good job! He did a very good job of presenting his argument as well as stating his sources. This does a lot to build credibility and make a strong argument. Very responsive to his opponents points. Great job!

    The decision is for the Opposition: Xavier Edmead

    Reason for Decision:

    Overall my decision was made based on the weight and impacts of the oppositions arguments. Both sides did a very good job, however the opposition had more evidence from professionals and had more conceded arguments as well which he identified well. Very close debate, both sides did great!


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT