Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Ethan Richer (Unaffiliated) vs. Opposition: Lucas Felings (Unaffiliated)

Judge: Farzan Sabzevari (Binghamton University)

Resolution: Resolved: Governments should implement a meat tax.

  • Ethan Richer
    Ethan Richer
    vs.



    Lucas Felings
    Lucas Felings
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 21, 2020 09:17:11AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 21, 2020 04:34:36PM EST by Lucas Felings

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 22, 2020 11:55:41PM EST by Ethan Richer

    Citations

    Show

    Citations


    https://apple.news/Awxu3VbNQRT6943_aEd_msg


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_government

    Posted at April 23, 2020 04:16:56PM EST by Lucas Felings

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 24, 2020 11:16:18PM EST by Ethan Richer

    Citations

    Show

    Citations

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/one-world-government-needed-to-cope-with-covid-19-says-former-british-pm

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/articles-amp/905864/coronavirus-case-oneworld-government

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 26, 2020 04:27:56AM EST by Farzan Sabzevari

    Category Ethan Richer Lucas Felings
    Use of evidence: 4.5 4
    Delivery skill: 4 3.5
    Coherence of arguments: 3.5 3.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.5 5
    Identification of key points: 4 4.5
    Comments: You do a great job with adding new sources and get all your points in to get your message across. Good job on not adding new information on your rebuttal and backing up your points. Only thing I could add to your rebuttal is to go at the negative sides points a little more. You show your points in a well manner and have them broken up into points, but dont have reasonings for all your points which needs to be worked on. Good job on taking advantage on how your opponent posted his videos wrong and going after his points.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Lucas Felings

    Reason for Decision:

    You both did a great job and I am 55/45 on my decision and voting for the negative side. This is from a great rebuttal and not including new information as well as adding to your points and proving your opponents points not true.


    3 Comments

    He had a screw up but he was capable of persuading his evidence in a better way. - Farzan Sabzevari on April 26, 2020 at 09:26PM EST
    Lucas submitted the correct video in order, however it was not posted.

    Clearly his opening proposition video was somehow reloaded out of order and shouldn't have been considered as "debating for the wrong side". - Lucas Felings on April 26, 2020 at 04:43PM EST
    The videos were posted incorrectly by Lucas not Ethan.
    How can you make a decision for someone who was debating for the wrong side?? - Ethan Richer on April 26, 2020 at 10:59AM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT