Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Jillian Boccia (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Greg Ginder (Binghamton University)

Judge: Aishwarya Masrani (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: Video games glorifying gun violence should be banned.

  • Jillian Boccia
    Jillian Boccia
    vs.



    Greg Ginder
    Greg Ginder
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Jillian Boccia

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Greg Ginder

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Jillian Boccia

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Greg Ginder

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Jillian Boccia

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Aishwarya Masrani

    Category Jillian Boccia Greg Ginder
    Use of evidence: 4 4
    Delivery skill: 5 5
    Coherence of arguments: 5.1 5.3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 5.1 5.2
    Identification of key points: 5.5 5.4
    Comments: Good job! The use of examples was good but you needed to be more responsive to the neg, especially the 2nr. Good Job! You should have spent more time on the CP and tell me why voting for it is better than the plan itself. Also why do I care about the author invites- impact it out.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Greg Ginder

    Reason for Decision:

    If the specifics of the plan, that the CP solved for was in the 2ac and not the 1ar, it would have been easier to vote aff. Aff also needs to be more responsive to the basic indites of the neg. In the last speech there was no reference to the 2Nr which is problematic.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT