Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Laurie Chang (San Diego Forensics) vs. Opposition: Phil Carnevale (Binghamton University)

Judge: Michael Schatz (University of Pennsylvania)

Resolution: Resolved: The United States Federal Government ought to pay reparations to African Americans.

  • Laurie Chang
    Laurie Chang
    vs.



    Phil Carnevale
    Phil Carnevale
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at October 13, 2015 04:13:06PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 13, 2015 09:34:30PM EST by Phil Carnevale

    Citations

    Show

    http://dfamily.com/philosophy/teach/hswtl/extras/ten-reasons-why-reparations-is-bad-idea-for-blacks.pdf
    David Horowitz, 2001, frontpagemagazine

    Posted at October 15, 2015 12:01:58AM EST by Laurie Chang

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 15, 2015 07:23:10PM EST by Phil Carnevale

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 17, 2015 01:05:11AM EST by Laurie Chang

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at October 18, 2015 09:14:20PM EST by Michael Schatz

    Category Laurie Chang Phil Carnevale
    Use of evidence: 2 3
    Delivery skill: 3 3.2
    Coherence of arguments: 3 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 2.2 3.5
    Identification of key points: 3 3.6
    Comments: Some of your videos seemed to end abruptly. Probably a tech glitch, but still... I felt like you didn't have much evidence and were just repeating the same points. At several points you seemed to agree with the opposition. You never addressed why the present generation should be held responsible for their ancestors' mistakes. I thought you were pretty well organized. You brought up some good counterpoints that she never addressed, which is why I voted for you.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Phil Carnevale

    Reason for Decision:

    The proposition never explained why the present generation should be held responsible for their ancestor's fault. I thought this was a big point, which is why I voted for the opposition.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT