Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Natalie Perales (San Diego Christian College) vs. Opposition: Jeffrey Twitty (Binghamton University)

Judge: Gregor Wolbring (University of Calgary)

Resolution: Resolved: The United States Federal Government ought to pay reparations to African Americans.

  • Natalie Perales
    Natalie Perales
    vs.



    Jeffrey Twitty
    Jeffrey Twitty
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at October 12, 2015 08:46:23PM EST by Natalie Perales

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 13, 2015 11:07:31PM EST by Jeffrey Twitty

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 15, 2015 12:35:50AM EST by Natalie Perales

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at October 16, 2015 01:57:51AM EST by Jeffrey Twitty

    Citations

    Show

    Max Du Plessis, 2003, Historical Injustice and International Law: An Exploratory Discussion of Reparation for

    Slavery,

    edu.proxy.binghamton.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v025/25.3du_plessis.html#top


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/10/why-native-americans-dont-want-reparations/

    Posted at October 16, 2015 03:32:44PM EST by Natalie Perales

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at October 16, 2015 09:12:40PM EST by Gregor Wolbring

    Category Natalie Perales Jeffrey Twitty
    Use of evidence: 2.1 3
    Delivery skill: 2.2 3
    Coherence of arguments: 3 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 3
    Identification of key points: 3 3
    Comments: I describe my decision below. I describe my decision below.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Jeffrey Twitty

    Reason for Decision:

    Thank you two for taking part in the competition. The topic is for sure interesting. For me it really comes down to use of evidence. I think both were not very good with it but Jeffrey was slightly better than Natalie although the use of evidence could be improved by both of you.
    Natalie was also less good in the delivery although Jeffrey can also improve.



    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT