Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: misaki inaba (Unaffiliated) vs. Opposition: Tempei Seki (Shorin Global)

Judge: David Kane (Binghamton University)

Resolution: This house believes that prisons should be abolished

  • misaki inaba
    misaki inaba
    vs.



    Tempei Seki
    Tempei Seki
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 13, 2015 03:31:25AM EST by misaki inaba

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 14, 2015 10:08:07AM EST by Tempei Seki

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 16, 2015 10:06:36AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 16, 2015 11:47:20PM EST by Tempei Seki

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 17, 2015 08:27:55AM EST by misaki inaba

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 17, 2015 11:05:25PM EST by David Kane

    Category misaki inaba Tempei Seki
    Use of evidence: 3 4
    Delivery skill: 1.5 4
    Coherence of arguments: 2 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 2 4
    Identification of key points: 2 4
    Comments: You constructive was not effectively delivered, and was hard to understand. Your vocalization when you inhaled was louder than any of the words you said. Slow down, articulate, and find a better volume for delivery.

    You rebuttal was almost too slow. It almost seemed like you were not sure what to say.

    Your closing argument had a better pace and you were clearer than in the constructive.
    Nice flow and pace. I particularly liked your gestures. I don't know if it was intentional, but you framed them in the screen nicely.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Tempei Seki

    Reason for Decision:

    The opposition had a nice turn of the Finland evidence presented by the proposition. If Finland is a good model, and they have prisons then the opposition wins.

    The opposition also did a good job of countering the in-prison violence argument of the proposition with the out-of-prison revenge violence that might occur otherwise.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT