Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: jessica seigal (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Moe Kobayashi (Shorin Global)

Judge: Brian Manuel (Stanford University)

Resolution: This house believes that prisons should be abolished

  • jessica seigal
    jessica seigal
    vs.



    Moe Kobayashi
    Moe Kobayashi
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 13, 2015 09:28:53PM EST by jessica seigal

    Citations

    Show

    1) Project Muse:
    Humans right quarterly
    title: All Too Familiar: Sexual Abuse of Women in U.S. State Prisons
    Nowhere to Hide: Retaliation Against Women in Michigan State Prisons
    Copyright 1999 The Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved.
    link: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v021/21.1br_womens_rights.html

    2) ABC News
    title: Prison Rape Widely Ignored by Authorities
    author: Dan Harris
    link: http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=131113

    3) Legislative Analyst's Office
    Title: How much does it cost to incarcerate an inmate in prison?
    link: http://www.lao.ca.gov/PolicyAreas/CJ/6_cj_inmatecost

    4) Craig Haney
    University of California, Santa Cruz
    title: The Psychological Impact of Incarceration:
    Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment
    link: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/prison2home02/haney.htm


    Posted at April 14, 2015 05:29:03PM EST by Moe Kobayashi

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 15, 2015 11:44:42PM EST by jessica seigal

    Citations

    Show

    cite 1:
    http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2010/s3018089.htm
    - abc.net
    author: mark colvin

    cite 2:
    https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v021/21.1br_womens_rights.html
    project muse
    Human Rights Quarterly Copyright 1999 The Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved.
    Human Rights Quarterly 21.1 (1999) 254-259

    Posted at April 17, 2015 08:34:53AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 17, 2015 08:04:20PM EST by jessica seigal

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 19, 2015 03:29:17AM EST by Brian Manuel

    Category jessica seigal Moe Kobayashi
    Use of evidence: 3.2 2.8
    Delivery skill: 3.1 2.8
    Coherence of arguments: 3.1 2.8
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.5 2.6
    Identification of key points: 3.8 3.1
    Comments: None at this moment. This was a very close debate None at this moment. This was a very close debate

    The decision is for the Proposition: jessica seigal

    Reason for Decision:

    I vote affirmative. The aff is controlling uniqueness to many of the negatives best points. The negative was unable to prove why abolition of prisons would be net worse than the status quo. The negative needed to spend more time on disads to abolition rather than unconnected advantages of the prison system.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT