Judge: Ian Kim (Binghamton University)
Resolution: Resolved: This house believes that being a vegetarian is a better ethical choice than meat eating.
Paul H. Lim
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at October 13, 2014 10:01:22PM EST by Rajesh Burela
Posted at October 15, 2014 01:05:37AM EST by Paul H. Lim
Posted at October 15, 2014 11:58:17PM EST by Rajesh Burela
Posted at October 17, 2014 01:29:14AM EST by Paul H. Lim
Thank you Judge and Rajesh for taking part in this debate round! I really enjoyed it. :)
Posted at October 18, 2014 12:39:56AM EST by Rajesh Burela
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at October 26, 2014 03:58:14PM EST by Ian Kim
|Category||Rajesh Burela||Paul H. Lim|
|Use of evidence:||4||3.5|
|Coherence of arguments:||4||3|
|Responsiveness to opponent:||4.2||3|
|Identification of key points:||4.4||3|
|Comments:||You're good at answering to the opponent's arguments. However, make sure to spend more time addressing your impact in the closing speech.
||Make sure to provide more explanation on why your impact is more harmful in a precise manner. Additionally, you need to spend more time addressing why the prop's impact is less important than yours.|
The decision is for the Proposition: Rajesh Burela
Reason for Decision:
The Prop clearly stated the impact, aka global warming, and diminished the neg's impact by providing an alternative and analytical arguments