Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Colleen Holtan (College of the Atlantic ) vs. Opposition: Brennan Young (Winston Churchill High School)

Judge: Rikki Dascal (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United Nations should adopt a resolution decrying or demanding an end to the annual dolphin hunt in Taiji, Japan.

  • Colleen Holtan
    Colleen Holtan
    vs.



    Brennan Young
    Brennan Young
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at May 5, 2014 09:23:00PM EST by Colleen Holtan

    Citations

    Show

    Andrew Butterworth, Philippa Brakes b, Courtney S. Vail c
    & Diana Reiss dA Veterinary and Behavioral
    Analysis of Dolphin Killing
    Methods Currently Used in the
    Drive Hunt in Taiji, Japan
    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10888705.2013.768925


    Philosophical-Legal Considerations for Ending
    Japanese Hunting of Small Cetaceans
    Emily Claire Sipes
    Lehigh University
    http://preserve.lehigh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2284&context=etd

    Posted at May 7, 2014 12:22:01AM EST by Brennan Young

    Citations

    Show

    Heritage 2000
    American Heritage Dictionary

    Speice and Lyle 03'
    Patrick Speice and Jim Lyle 2003 traditional policy debate: now more than ever Oceans Policy Adrift

    James Rachel
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland, 1993
    [Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol 71, No 4 (1993), pp. 463-475]


    Dershowitz 14'
    University of Durban Westville, and at the University of Natal, Durban. He has been lecturing philosophy since 1996. WHY WE NEED A NEW ETHIC FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, 2000, http://www.crvp.org/book/Series02/II-7/chapter_vii.htm)

    Posted at May 7, 2014 09:54:05PM EST by Colleen Holtan

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 9, 2014 01:02:00AM EST by Brennan Young

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 9, 2014 08:38:22PM EST by Colleen Holtan

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 11, 2014 11:09:25PM EST by Rikki Dascal

    Category Colleen Holtan Brennan Young
    Use of evidence: 3.5 3.8
    Delivery skill: 3 4.5
    Coherence of arguments: 2.7 4.2
    Responsiveness to opponent: 2.6 4
    Identification of key points: 2.7 4.5
    Comments: Not entirely sure what you're advocating for; I would have like to have seen it laid out in a more comprehensive manner. You need to be more responsive to opponent, especially with things like framework.
    Good work splitting up the arguments and carrying them through the round.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Brennan Young

    Reason for Decision:

    Voted on the d/a and framework. These were completely unanswered by the aff until the last speech. Aff does not make it clear what she is advocating for. Regarding the corruption d/a, aff fails to give reason as to why the UN is a unique body to do this through.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT