Judge: A. Marie Houser (Unaffiliated)
Resolution: RESOLVED: The United Nations should adopt a resolution decrying or demanding an end to the annual dolphin hunt in Taiji, Japan.
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at May 5, 2014 11:25:41PM EST by Byron Ruano
Posted at May 7, 2014 09:00:46AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz
None available for this speech.
Posted at May 8, 2014 10:12:59PM EST by Jessica Nagulendran
Saudi Arabian woman killed after defying ban on driving - http://www.newvision.co.ug/news/655388-saudi-woman-killed-defying-driving-ban.html Myanmar abuse of Rohingya - http://www.arabnews.com/news/568066 NYPD Stop-and-Frisk - http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices Japanese women career struggles - http://thediplomat.com/2013/12/japan-struggles-with-women-in-the-workforce/ Norway and Icelands refusal to compromise - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/03/140331-whaling-japan-international-court-ocean-animal-conservation/
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at May 11, 2014 10:17:22PM EST by A. Marie Houser
|Category||Byron Ruano||Jessica Nagulendran|
|Use of evidence:||4||3|
|Coherence of arguments:||3.8||2.5|
|Responsiveness to opponent:||3.5||2.5|
|Identification of key points:||4.5||4.5|
|Comments:||Hi Byron, you started off very strong, but didn't finish quite as well. The proposition closing might have been a time to talk about how some UN resolutions carry legal authority -- for instance, the Declaration for Human Rights (what Jessica keyed in on) is not a binding document, but the UN's international covenants are -- and these have been used to force, for instance, an investigation into police brutality in Australia. You responded very effectively to Jessica's misapprehension of your arguments. Overall, a good job.||Hi Jessica, you presented well in terms of organization and clarity, but did miss the mark in your opposition constructive. You recovered a bit in your opposition rebuttal by using the Declaration of Human Rights as an example of resolutions that are nonbinding and nonperformative. The other points were far less persuasive. Thank you for participating.|
The decision is for the Proposition: Byron Ruano
Reason for Decision:
As I discuss in the video, I thought that Byron had the more cogent and persuasive argument, one that included more than one appeal: a logical appeal, yes, but also an appeal to ethos, or issues about credibility and morality. He did an effective job of calling into question Jessica's anticipation that Japan might ignore an order mandated by the ICJ, as against Japan's history of abiding by the ICJ's order that it stop whaling under the guise of scientific pursuits.
Video from the judge: