Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Reva Agashe (NEI Education) vs. Opposition: Nathan Stouffer (Wood River High School)

Judge: Rachel Cotrino (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United Nations should adopt a resolution decrying or demanding an end to the annual dolphin hunt in Taiji, Japan.

  • Reva Agashe
    Reva Agashe
    vs.



    Nathan Stouffer
    Nathan Stouffer
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 29, 2014 12:56:25AM EST by Reva Agashe

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 29, 2014 10:41:33PM EST by Nathan Stouffer

    Citations

    Show

    http://www.philforhumanity.com/Why_the_United_Nations_is_a_Useless_Failure.html
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-meier/concerned-about-japanese-_b_4859463.html

    Posted at May 1, 2014 01:48:44AM EST by Reva Agashe

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at May 1, 2014 08:05:40PM EST by Nathan Stouffer

    Citations

    Show

    Same as first speech.

    Posted at May 2, 2014 10:41:01PM EST by Reva Agashe

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at May 4, 2014 10:20:01PM EST by Rachel Cotrino

    Category Reva Agashe Nathan Stouffer
    Use of evidence: 4.5 3.5
    Delivery skill: 4 4
    Coherence of arguments: 4.5 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 4.5
    Identification of key points: 4.5 4.5
    Comments: Nice use of citations. Good identification of key points. Good proposal for the UN to write a report to bring awareness to the issues of the dolphin hunt. You did a great job of using examples to make your point, but you failed to cite your sources, which made your argument weaker.

    The decision is for the Proposition: Reva Agashe

    Reason for Decision:

    Both of you did a great job responding to each other. I voted for Reva because of her use of sources and had a better plan. I wasn't persuaded by the "chicken card." Job well done on both sides. This was a close debate.


    1 Comment

    Thank you judge and opponent for a great round! And judge for clarification, I cited my sources in my speeches and the citation box. Thank you. - Nathan Stouffer on May 4, 2014 at 11:03PM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT