Judge: Joe Leeson-Schatz (Binghamton University)
Resolution: Choice of Three
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at October 15, 2013 12:46:37AM EST by Luke Holden
Michael Specter 04/02/2013 ([Staff writer specializing in science, technology and public health], The New Yorker, "Can We Patent Life?", http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/myriad-genetics-patent-genes.html
Jonathan King 02/05/1999 ([Professor of molecular biology at MIT], Council for Responsible Genetics, "PATENTS ON CELLS, GENES, AND ORGANISMS UNDERMINE THE EXCHANGE OF SCIENTIFIC IDEAS", http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=171)
Michelle Spektor 08/17/2011 ([Writer for Science Progress], Science Progress, "Genes Are Still Patentable, Federal Appeals Court Rules", http://scienceprogress.org/2011/08/genes-are-still-patentable/)
Andrew Plemmons Pratt 03/30/2010 ([Managing editor of Science Progress], Science Progress, "Court Rules that DNA Is Information, Not Intellectual Property", http://scienceprogress.org/2010/03/gene-patents-ruling/)
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at November 7, 2013 12:25:15PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz
The decision is for the Proposition: Luke Holden
Reason for Decision:
The opposition failed to post their video on time, resulting in a forfeit.