Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Joe Leeson-Schatz

Joe Leeson-Schatz
General Information
Name: Joe Leeson-Schatz
Affiliation: Binghamton University
Join Time: December 26, 2012 at 01:00AM EST
Send Message: You must Create an Account and Log-In to message users.
Debating Statistics
Wins: 0 (0 are Byes)
Losses: 0 (0 are Forfeits)
Average Points (Out of 30): 0 (0 total)
*Opponent Wins: 0
*Opponent Points: 0
Judging Statistics
Total Rounds Judged: 71
Average Points Given (Out of 30): 20.8
Voted Proposition In: 56.34% of rounds
Voted Opposition In: 43.66% of rounds
Average Length of Notes (Characters): 2276.2 (161612 total)
Matches
Current: None
Past:

BU's 4th Annual Online Debate Tournament in Conjunction with NASA Astrobiology Debates

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Round 3

Finals

Intralinked Debate - The 5th Semesterly Evans Cup

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Binghamton University's 3rd Annual Online Debate Tournament

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Round 3

Intralinked Debate - The 4th Semesterly Evans Cup

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Binghamton University's 2nd Annual Online Debate Tournament

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Round 3

Intralinked Debate - The 3rd Semesterly Evans Cup

Show

Round 1

Round 2

Interlinked Debate - The 2nd Semesterly Evans Cup

Show

Binghamton University's 1st Annual Online Debate Tournament

Show

Round The First

Round The Second

Final Round

RHET 354/450v Extra Credit Tournament

Show

Round 1

RHET 354 Class Tournament (The Evans Cup)

Show

Round 1

Round 2

*Does not count opponents in bye or forfeit rounds.

Other
About Me: I am the Director of Speech & Debate at Binghamton University.
Judge Philosophy: I will judge rounds based upon the content of the debater's arguments and not my personal beliefs. Arguments not answered are considered conceded and I value the use and quality of evidence. You do not need to read cards but you should make reference to the sources you are referring to and make the citations available on the website. Being rhetorically powerful is important but the content of your speech is more important to me in terms of judging.
Connect with Binghamton:
Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

PHP MySQL SUIT