Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Christian Chessman (University of Florida) vs. Opposition: David Diaso Jr. (San Diego Christian College)

Judge: Amanda Jaret (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.

  • Christian Chessman
    Christian Chessman
    vs.



    David  Diaso Jr.
    David Diaso Jr.
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Christian Chessman

    Citations

    Show

    all cites available at request to cchessman@ufl.edu

    Posted at N/A by David Diaso Jr.

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Christian Chessman

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by David Diaso Jr.

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Christian Chessman

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Amanda Jaret

    Category Christian Chessman David Diaso Jr.
    Use of evidence: 3 3
    Delivery skill: 4.5 3.6
    Coherence of arguments: 4.5 3
    Responsiveness to opponent: 4.5 2.5
    Identification of key points: 5 4.1
    Comments: -Loved your opening speech and was so psyched to hear how this debate was going to go down until all the technical errors.

    -Thought your delivery was very effective

    -Good responses and well-impacted theory arguments

    -Effective delivery

    -Would have preferred to hear some substantive arguments instead of just theoretical and rules-based objections

    -Thought you impacted your arguments about rules violations well

    The decision is for the Proposition: Christian Chessman

    Reason for Decision:

    As my video suggests, I end up voting for the proposition in this round for several reasons.

    First, while I appreciate the education and rules-based arguments David is making, I do not think this is a malicious rules violation, and I think Christian demonstrated reliance on the approval of the tournament director and offered several alternatives (messaging him, looking up his opening speech on YouTube, etc.) that could have been pursued during the normal time limits that might have averted this whole problem. While I appreciate that this caused trouble, I just do not think the "punitive approach" is the correct response to what happened in this round.

    Second, I think Christian is winning the education arguments because of his proposal to continue the debate after ceding one of his speeches. This should have been the equalizing force that allowed some substantive debate to occur. It seems that this compromises your education claims a bit, David, since at least we could have talked about animals for a lil while that way.

    Finally, I think Christian is ahead on the fairness portions of the debate. It seems to me that this was an honest mistake and that David could have tried to engage substantively in a few different ways and did not or was not able to do so. While this is a shame and I wish the debate had gone differently, I think this is the most equitable way of resolving matters.

    I wish you both the very best and hope you stick with debate (and animals)!

    Video from the judge:


    2 Comments

    also - are you a law student? "cured the defect" sounds like the appellate opinions I spend free time reading. - Christian Chessman on May 8, 2013 at 02:55AM EST
    Thanks Amanda! Sorry this turned into theory - I wish this could have been better for all of us. I appreciate you listening to us talk about talk for 20+ minutes.

    I would have been interested in hearing your engagement with my Butler aff, David. I'm sorry the tech stuff went south. Maybe we'll get to debate online in the future, and then I'll double check all my tech.

    all the best to both of you,
    Christian - Christian Chessman on May 8, 2013 at 02:51AM EST

    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT