Judge: Christopher Kozak (Rutgers University)
Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.
|Click to begin|
Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.
Posted at N/A by Dhruv Sehgal
This match has been completed. Show the Decision.
Submitted at N/A by Christopher Kozak
|Category||Crystal Hall||Dhruv Sehgal|
|Use of evidence:||5.5||5.1|
|Coherence of arguments:||5||4.7|
|Responsiveness to opponent:||5.5||4.9|
|Identification of key points:||5.2||4|
|Comments:||I think that you rely on too much LD tech in this debate. Granted I understand it but this is not a strictly LD format. You would have been better off in this debate by just focusing and sitting on the impact turn arguments of util and instrumentality that the negative never really responds to.||You need a better ethical framework other then utill or common sense. I felt you should have read some impact turns of ecocentrism or anthropocentrism good arguments. You need a better defense of utill as well. Like util key to policy making or some other philosophical defense. Just saying "it saves the most lives" is not the best warrant in this instance.|
The decision is for the Proposition: Crystal Hall
Reason for Decision:
RFD: Short Version. ( I am lazy and don't feel like typing the whole RFD so I made a youtube video for the long version.)
I ended up voting affirmative because they are doing a better job at winning the overall ethical framing for how I evaluate impacts in the debate.
I dont think the negatives util/common sense framework is persuasive in the context of the root cause arguments that go conceded by the negative.
I highly recommend you watch the video as it is detailed and addresses individual arguments in the debate.
Please feel free to email me or message me questions about the debate after watching the video.
Video from the judge: