Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Eun Suk Hong (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Donald Warden (Oglethorpe University)

Judge: Larry Barnes (Wood River High School)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.

  • Eun Suk Hong
    Eun Suk Hong
    vs.



    Donald Warden
    Donald Warden
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Eun Suk Hong

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Donald Warden

    Citations

    Show

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090722-chimps-aids.html

    Larose, Daniel T.Discovering Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman, 2013. Print.

    http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/35979/InTech-New_models_for_the_in_vitro_study_of_liver_toxicity_3d_culture_systems_and_the_role_of_bioreactors.pdf

    Posted at N/A by Eun Suk Hong

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Donald Warden

    Citations

    Show

    Just so everyone knows what Moore's law is:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law

    And Gregor Mendel:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel

    I don't normally like Wikipedia, but I think it serves our purposes here.

    Posted at N/A by Eun Suk Hong

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Larry Barnes

    Category Eun Suk Hong Donald Warden
    Use of evidence: 3 3.9
    Delivery skill: 3 3.4
    Coherence of arguments: 2.6 3.9
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 3.3
    Identification of key points: 3 3.5
    Comments: For your next debate, you should fix your sound issues. You were difficult to understand, and there was a strange feedback in the background.

    Make your points clearly and if your opponent is dragging the debate in a direction you don't want to go, say why it would be better to use your framework.
    To a non debate person, your whole case feels like an attempt to avoid discussing the real issue, which was disappointing to me. I understand that I am judging by what actually went on in the round, so since he didn't engage you on those issues, I vote for you, but I would have rather had the resolution actually discussed.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Donald Warden

    Reason for Decision:

    Neither side did a very good job of responding to opponent's arguments. I have to vote Opposition because since Proposition didn't provide definitions or a proposal for how I should judge the debate, while the opposition did.

    Thanks, this has been interesting.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT