Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Anthony Mattis (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Lane Coulthard (Wood River High School)

Judge: Jim Freeman (The New School)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.

  • Anthony Mattis
    Anthony Mattis
    vs.



    Lane Coulthard
    Lane Coulthard
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Anthony Mattis

    Citations

    Show

    Rollin, Bernard (Professor of Biomedical Science at Colarado State University), The EMBO Journal, "Animal Research: A Moral Science"
    (http://www.nature.com/embor/journal/v8/n6/full/7400996.html)

    B. Ekwall, Overview of the Final MEIC Results: II. The In Vitro-In Vivo Evaluation, Including the Selection of a Practical Battery of Cell Tests for Prediction of Acute Lethal Blood Concentrations in Humans, Toxicology in Vitro, 13 (1999): 665-673.
    (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20654532)

    Rogers, Kara. September 17, 2007. (Ph.D. in pharmacology and toxicology from the University of Arizona), "Scientific Alternatives for Animal Testing,"
    (www.advocacy.britannica.com/blog/advocacy/2007/09/scientific-alternatives-to-animal-testing-a-progress-report/)

    Peter Sandercock et al. (Professor, Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Edinburgh), British Medical Journal, "Where is the Evidence That Animal Research Benefits Humans?" (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC351856/)

    Robinson, M.K., May 2002 (Qualifications: PhD Human and Environment Safety Division at the Procter and Gamble Company),Food and Chemical Toxicology,"Non-animal testing strategies for assessment of the skin corrosion and skin irritation potential of ingredients and finished products", (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691502000054)

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Jim Freeman

    The decision is for the Proposition: Anthony Mattis

    Reason for Decision:

    The proposition has posted a video that the opposition failed to respond to within the time constraints. As such, the proposition wins by default.

    Joe Leeson-Schatz
    Director of Speech & Debate at Binghamton University


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT