Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Joey Reidy (Wood River High School) vs. Opposition: Dhruv Sehgal (Binghamton University)

Judge: Jim Freeman (The New School)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.

  • Joey Reidy
    Joey Reidy
    vs.



    Dhruv Sehgal
    Dhruv Sehgal
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Joey Reidy

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Dhruv Sehgal

    Citations

    Show

    http://books.google.com/books/about/Animal.html?id=ju2HL8Sd6SsC
    http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/08/15/the-debate-should-testing-on-animals-be-banned/
    http://levmm1.wordpress.com/

    Posted at N/A by Joey Reidy

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Dhruv Sehgal

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Joey Reidy

    Citations

    Show

    http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-to-animal-testing.aspx

    http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-testing-without-torture.aspx

    http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/singer02.htm

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Jim Freeman

    Category Joey Reidy Dhruv Sehgal
    Use of evidence: 2.2 4.5
    Delivery skill: 3 3
    Coherence of arguments: 3.4 4.6
    Responsiveness to opponent: 2.2 4.2
    Identification of key points: 3.5 3.7
    Comments: you waste too much time attacking strawmen in dismissing the blog. you gotta spend that time actually answering the warrants of his arguments. very good overall. nice line by line work and explanation of your case. you're saying vote neg over and over again all the times you're saying "vote neg" is time you can be making arguments.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Dhruv Sehgal

    Reason for Decision:

    neg wins that not ALL forms of animal testing are bad and what is ethical is what is good for society. hooray util good


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT