Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Matthew Bennett (University of Washington Bothell) vs. Opposition: Jeff Cragle (Binghamton University)

Judge: Shree Awsare (James Madison University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United States Federal Government should ban all testing that requires the use of animals.

  • Matthew Bennett
    Matthew Bennett
    vs.



    Jeff Cragle
    Jeff Cragle
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Matthew Bennett

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Jeff Cragle

    Citations

    Show

    gallup poll: http://www.gallup.com/poll/154799/Americans-Including-Catholics-Say-Birth-Control-Morally.aspx

    Posted at N/A by Matthew Bennett

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Jeff Cragle

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Matthew Bennett

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Shree Awsare

    Category Matthew Bennett Jeff Cragle
    Use of evidence: 2.1 3
    Delivery skill: 2.7 2.7
    Coherence of arguments: 3 2.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 2.5
    Identification of key points: 2.7 2.6
    Comments: You should cite more evidence/qualified authors to make your claim. I'd also suggest making comparisons (even if animal testing is beneficial to humans, why would it STILL be a bad idea?) I think your arguments are good, but your speech needs to be more responsive to his (for example, you need to deal with your opponents' claim that alternate forms of testing like that of human tissues solves better)

    The decision is for the Proposition: Matthew Bennett

    Reason for Decision:

    Alternatives to animal testing that exist in the status quo solves the opposition's impacts of human suffering. There is only a risk that we unnecessarily hurt animals.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT