Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Tim Keegan (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Molly Depew (Binghamton University)

Judge: Annabelle North (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: Video games glorifying gun violence should be banned.

  • Tim Keegan
    Tim Keegan
    vs.



    Molly Depew
    Molly Depew
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at N/A by Tim Keegan

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Molly Depew

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Tim Keegan

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Molly Depew

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at N/A by Tim Keegan

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at N/A by Annabelle North

    Category Tim Keegan Molly Depew
    Use of evidence: 4.2 3
    Delivery skill: 3.5 3
    Coherence of arguments: 2.8 3.9
    Responsiveness to opponent: 1.5 3.9
    Identification of key points: 2.8 3
    Comments: I judged your last round, and you made the same mistakes this time around. You need to respond more to your opponent's arguments. The strength of your arguments doesn't negate the strength of your opposition's claims, you need to directly address them from the start. You also did dropped the same argument as last time, regarding the government's inability to censor game content, and once again only responded in your final speech. You should spend more time in your final speech elaborating on your strongest position, rather than just providing defense against the aff's argument. Point out earlier in your speech which arguments your opponent dropped, and explain the significance of them.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Molly Depew

    Reason for Decision:

    Aff needs to answer the neg's claim regarding the constitutionality of government censorship earlier in the round.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT